Well, I decided today that, after 4 years of representing myself, through the filing of the action, drafting of pleadings, fighting pre-trial motions, etc., I would retain a lawyer for the trial.
There is an old saying that a lawyer who represents himself has a fool for a client.
So, I realize that it is better to have Counsel.
To the various lawyers who I have previously talked to, who gave me huge quotations on the amount of the fees they would charge, or who despite their self-described commitment to justice, stopped communicating with me when they became afraid of what the 21 year old Islamists might do, just be glad I am not publishing your names here.
Incidentally, the lawyer representing Chapters is a specialist in insurance law. She has a lot of integrity. When we came to the pre-trial which is meant to encourage settlement by the parties, she told the Judge presiding over the pre-trial that she had not yet had time to read the file and therefore couldn't really comment on settlement. Then at a pre-trial motion, when I mentioned that in response to some complaint she made about the timeliness of certain documentary productions, she denied saying that to the Judge presiding at the Pre-trial. Then when I wrote a letter complaining about her ethics to the senior partner at that firm, he wrote back a threatening letter to the effect that I was so stupid not to know that matters discussed at a pre-Trial were privileged and couldn't be disclosed. But of course he was completely wrong...it is only the substantive facts and matters discussed in an effort to settle that are privileged, not the fact that the lawyer came unprepared to discuss settlement. That from the senior partner of one of the big Bay Street insurance law firms.
Anyway by handling all those aggravating parts of the action myself, I saved about $10,000. But now it is a good investment to hire trial counsel.
Stay tuned. There is a lot more to this story.

